So many ideas, so few hours in the day.

Really looking forward to today's seminar on Beckett and Parmenides by Anthony Uhlmann

Trying to figure out which way to introduce a Lacanian reading of Mieville's The City & The City

Fine tuning a pair of articles.

So many ways to discuss post-structuralism; none of them particularly endearing.

Well, the lecture on the political protest and propaganda photomontage/photo-manipulation of the 1920s and 1930s went splendidly. I even got invited back.

If Schuman taught us that "I think where enjoyment evacuates", maybe the common head cold is the third term wherein we neither think nor enjoy but suffer quietl

The latest issue of Cosmos and History (5/1) looks fabulous!

Another month, another journal article. Look out Pli! Fabulous psychoanalytic-philosophy coming your way!

There is far too much to say about photomontage in the 1920s and 1930s.

Reading Lacan's "My Teaching" at the moment, and can see the hallmarks of 'that Lacan'. It's irritating when historicism infiltrates your gaze.

Teaching is proving to be very varied this semester: enlightenment philosophy, art theory, and audience research.

The International Society for Cultural History definitely know how to put the 'inter' into 'disciplinarity'.

I find photo-montage rather pondersome, but the theory behind it is quite fascinating.

Knocking on publishers' doors sometimes alleviates a previously unknown burden.

The feints of concision often leave me wondering.

The bios of our epoch is not that of ancient Greece. But there are lessons we can learn.

Palahniuk's writing is not nihilistic, that is not going far enough! It is romantic and minimalist!

Oh dear Journal for Lacanian Studies, won't you please find a new publisher.

Chuck Palahniuk's narratives about domestic terrorism never address terror at any agent in particular. It's more a drive or affect than a symptom.